Sunk Cost sunkcost.ai Data checked 2026-09-03

Granite 4.2 30B vs Flint 40B-A2.5B

Granite 4.2 30B scores 15 on the intelligence index, and Flint 40B-A2.5B has not been placed on it. Both take the same machine to start: the cheapest here that runs either is the Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB, at $1,299. The Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB is priced as the card alone, without the PC around it. On it, Flint 40B-A2.5B is about 6.2× quicker: 131 tok/s against 21, both estimated from memory bandwidth. At 500k tokens a day the Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB pays for itself in 85 years running Flint 40B-A2.5B, against 178 years running Granite 4.2 30B.

Granite 4.2 30BFlint 40B-A2.5B
Intelligence index15not placed
ClassHaiku-classnot yet placed
Weights18 GB25 GB
Needs at 32k26 GB26 GB
QuantisationQ4_K_MUD-Q4_K_XL
Parameters29.3B39.8B (2.5B active)
Max context128k256k
API price per 1M$0.0605 in / $0.4 outpriced as GLM-4.7-Flash$0.05 in / $0.7 outpriced as Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
LicenceApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Machines here that run it27 of 3727 of 37
Cheapest machine that runs itAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB $1,299card onlyAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB $1,299card only

Run Granite 4.2 30B on the Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB · or Flint 40B-A2.5B

Jump to: Side by side on the Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB · How much use it takes to pay for the machine · Memory is not what separates them · The assumptions behind both columns

Side by side on the Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB

The cheapest machine that runs either model is the same one, so this is the pair doing the same work on the same hardware: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB, at $1,299card only.

Granite 4.2 30BFlint 40B-A2.5B
Speed at 32k21 tok/s estimated131 tok/s estimated
Pay-back on this machinePays back in 178 yearsPays back in 85 years
API cost per month$1.24priced as GLM-4.7-Flash$1.38priced as Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

Run Granite 4.2 30B on the Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB · or Flint 40B-A2.5B

How much use it takes to pay for the machine

Everything above is at 500k tokens a day. Pay-back moves with how much you actually run, so here are both models at the five levels of use the calculator names, on the Radeon AI PRO R9700, 32GB. Flint 40B-A2.5B pays for it sooner at every level of use, so which of them to run does not turn on how hard you work it.

A day's useGranite 4.2 30BFlint 40B-A2.5B
50ka few chats a day1,784 years848 years
200klight assistant use446 years212 years
1Ma moderate coding-assistant day89 years42 years
4Mheavy coding with an agent22 years11 years
20Magents running most of the day4.5 years2.1 years

Run Granite 4.2 30B at 20M tokens a day · or Flint 40B-A2.5B

Memory is not what separates them

Granite 4.2 30B needs 26 GB of memory at 32k of context and Flint 40B-A2.5B needs 26 GB. Every machine priced here that runs one runs the other, at 32k of context. So the choice between them is what each is good at, how fast it runs and what the same work costs on an API, not what you have to buy to hold it.

Granite 4.2 30B is also head to head with Gemma 4 31B it above it on the leaderboard and GLM-4.7-Flash below it. Flint 40B-A2.5B is also head to head with Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B, which needs much the same memory.

The assumptions behind both columns

Both columns use the same usage: 500k tokens a day at 15:1 input to output, 32k of context, $0.17 per kWh, and today's API prices held flat. Speeds marked estimated are worked out from memory bandwidth rather than measured, and pay-back scales with them. Where nobody rents an open model by the token, its API prices are the nearest hosted model's, named beside them. Machines are the 37 here with a published price that are still sold. Change any of it in the calculator.

More head to head: every machine that runs Granite 4.2 30B · every machine that runs Flint 40B-A2.5B · every other match-up · both against the frontier · the quickest pay-back at each level of use