Can a Strix Halo GMKtec EVO-X2, 64GB run local LLMs?
Yes — 32 of the 48 current models on this site fit in its 48 GB of usable memory. The strongest it holds, Qwen3.8 27B, runs at 10 tok/s with a 32k window, worked out from memory bandwidth. Whether that saves you money is a different question: at $2,200 and 500k tokens a day, it pays back in 168 years.
Run the numbers on this machine
What the GMKtec EVO-X2, 64GB runs
They do not all hold the same window. The weights are a fixed size, but the key-value cache grows with every token you keep, so what is left of 48 GB after the weights is how far the context goes. On one of the 12 below, this machine's memory is what runs out first: Granite 4.2 30B stops soonest, at 64k. The rest reach 256k, where the calculator's list ends, or the longest setting their own context limit allows.
| Model | Speed | Class | Memory | Longest context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 27BQ4_K_M | 10 tok/s estimated | Sonnet-class | 19 GB | 256k |
| Qwen3.6 27BQ4_K_M | 10 tok/s estimated | Haiku-class | 19 GB | 256k |
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9BIQ2 | 48 tok/s estimated | Haiku-class | 22 GB | 256k |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3BQ4_K_M | 56 tok/s estimated | Haiku-class | 23 GB | 256k |
| Muse Glimmer 30BQ4_K_M | 11 tok/s estimated | Haiku-class | 18 GB | 128k |
| Gemma 4 26B-A4BQ4_K_M | 41 tok/s estimated | Haiku-class | 18 GB | 256k |
| Gemma 4 31B itQ4_K_M | 8.3 tok/s estimated | Haiku-class | 23 GB | 256k |
| Granite 4.2 30BQ4_K_M | 7.3 tok/s estimated | Haiku-class | 26 GB | 64kmemory |
| GLM-4.7-FlashQ4_K_M | 40 tok/s estimated | Haiku-class | 20 GB | 128k |
| Gemma 4 12BQ4_K_M | 24 tok/s estimated | Below every hosted tier | 8.0 GB | 256k |
| Qwen3.5 9BQ4_K_M | 28 tok/s estimated | Below every hosted tier | 6.8 GB | 256k |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3BQ4_K_M | 54 tok/s estimated | Below every hosted tier | 26 GB | 256k |
Speed and memory are at 32k context, the setting the calculator starts on; the memory column is the weights plus the cache for that much of it. Each speed says how it was arrived at, and every one here is estimated from this machine's 256 GB/s of memory bandwidth rather than taken from a published benchmark. There is a page on how that sum works, and what each size needs, and one on what 64 GB runs, machine by machine. The longest context is the longest setting the calculator offers that this machine still holds the model at, cache included, and each one opens the calculator on that model at that length. A figure tagged memory is one this machine ran out of room for, and the rest are stopped by the model's own limit or by the end of the list.
For scale, the calculator starts from 80 tok/s for a hosted API and times a local machine against it. Nothing above reaches it, and the quickest is 56 tok/s.
20 more fit. Ranked below the twelve above: MiniCPM5 2B, Qwen3.5 4B, Ling 3.0 tiny, Granite 4.2 8B, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Gemma 4 E4B, LFM2.5 2.6B, Devstral Small 2 24B, Ministral 3 14B, Ministral 3 8B. The other 9 have no intelligence-index score, so the ranking cannot place them: Laguna XS 2.1, LFM3 1.7B, Ornith 1.5 9B, Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B, Spark-X2.5 4B, Spark-X2.6 4B, KAT-Coder V2.5 Dev 35B-A3B, LFM2.5 24B-A2B, Flint 40B-A2.5B. Their pages show what each one needs and what runs it.
The 48 counted above are the current models. This site prices 16 superseded ones as well, because people still run them, and this machine holds 11 of those at 32k, strongest first: Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct at Q4_K_M, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct at Q8_0, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct, Qwen3 32B at Q4_K_M, Qwen3 32B at Q8_0, Qwen3 14B, Qwen3 8B, Gemma 3 27B it, Gemma 3 12B it. Each of those pages asks whether the model is still worth running.
What has been measured on the GMKtec EVO-X2, 64GB
Not one of the speeds above was measured on this machine, and that is not because nobody has run a model on one. This site holds two published speeds taken on this machine, one of them on a superseded model the table above leaves out. They are below, as published and again at 32k of context, which is what every other speed on this page is taken at.
| Model | At 32k | As published |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507Q4_K_Msuperseded | 33 tok/s measured | 86 tok/smeasured at an empty window |
| Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3BQ4_K_M | 33 tok/s measured | 86 tok/smeasured at an empty window |
A published figure is what its source reports, at the window the model was run at. The 32k figure is that measurement read at 32k of context: every token generated reads the weights and the whole key-value cache, so the longer the window the slower it runs. The figures come from visorcraft/strix-halo-llm-perf.
Other machines to weigh against the GMKtec EVO-X2, 64GB
| Machine | Price | Memory | Models that fit | Pay-back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Strix Halo machines | ||||
| Strix Halo Framework Desktop, 32GB | $1,269 | 32 GB | 29 | Pays back in 91 years |
| Strix Halo Corsair AI Workstation 300, 64GB | $1,700 | 64 GB | 32 | Pays back in 121 years |
| Strix Halo Framework Desktop, 64GB | $1,959 | 64 GB | 32 | Pays back in 140 years |
| Strix Halo Framework Desktop, 128GB | $3,449 | 128 GB | 39 | Pays back in 246 years |
| Strix Halo GMKtec EVO-X2, 128GB | $3,500 | 128 GB | 39 | Pays back in 267 years |
| Strix Halo GMKtec EVO-X3, 128GB | $3,600 | 128 GB | 39 | Pays back in 275 years |
| Strix Halo Minisforum MS-S1 Max, 128GB | $3,799 | 128 GB | 39 | Pays back in 271 years |
| Strix Halo Beelink GTR9 Pro, 128GB | $4,349 | 128 GB | 39 | Pays back in 311 years |
| Strix Halo Corsair AI Workstation 300, 128GB | $4,700 | 128 GB | 39 | Pays back in 336 years |
| Strix Halo HP Z2 Mini G1a, 128GB | $5,544 | 128 GB | 39 | Pays back in 396 years |
| Strix Halo Framework Desktop, 192GB | not published | 192 GB | 42 | Not enough data to compute a pay-back. |
| Nearest in price elsewhere on the list | ||||
| MacBook Air M5 (15-inch), 16GB | $1,499 | 16 GB | 12 | Pays back in 118 years |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, 32GB | $1,999card only | 32 GB | 32 | Pays back in 123 years |
| Mac mini M5 Pro, 48GB | $2,299 | 48 GB | 32 | Pays back in 155 years |
| MacBook Pro M5 (14-inch), 32GB | $2,399 | 32 GB | 22 | Pays back in 157 years |
| Mac Studio M5 Max, 36GB | $2,499 | 36 GB | 32 | Pays back in 149 years |
Every row uses the same defaults as the figures above: 500k tokens a day at 15:1 input to output, 32k context, and each machine's strongest model that fits, counted against the same 48 current models. The GeForce RTX 5090, 32GB is priced as the card alone, so add the PC around it before comparing it with a complete computer. All seven cards here are ranked by what each one holds.
Head to head with another computer: Framework Desktop, 64GB · Mac mini M5 Pro, 48GB. With the same machine at another memory size: 128GB. There are 111 machine match-ups on the site.
The specifics
- Chip
- GMKtec EVO-X2 — Ryzen AI Max+ 395 · Radeon 8060S, 40 CU
- Memory bandwidth
- 256 GB/s — Measured GPU bandwidth is ~212-215 GB/s of the 256 GB/s theoretical, so estimates here run a little high.
- Usable by the GPU
- 48 GB — Windows lets you dedicate up to 75% of RAM to the GPU (Variable Graphics Memory in AMD Adrenalin; Framework documents 96 GB on a 128 GB board). On Linux the amdgpu GTT pool can be raised to roughly 108-120 GB with ttm.pages_limit / amdgpu.gttsize boot parameters. The Windows figure is used here as the conservative one.
- Power under load
- 150 W (measured by a third party) — ServeTheHome's 147-160 W figure was on the 128 GB unit; same chip.
- Availability
- 64 GB / 1 TB $2,199.99 in stock when checked. 48 GB usable follows the same 75% Windows split Framework documents for a 64 GB board.
- Sources
- GMKtec, ServeTheHome, Framework